The dispute over harassment in the civil sphere: #Metoo and the Une autre parole
The dispute of meaning generated by the found positions of #Metoo and Une autre parole about harassment and its sanction in the Latin American, European, and American press is analyzed. The competing speeches that legitimized and contaminated the claims of both positions were examined. The methodolo...
Gorde:
| Egile Nagusiak: | , |
|---|---|
| Formatua: | Artículo |
| Hizkuntza: | spa |
| Argitaratua: |
Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez
2021
|
| Gaiak: | |
| Sarrera elektronikoa: | http://erevistas.uacj.mx/ojs/index.php/noesis/article/view/3276 |
| Etiketak: |
Etiketa erantsi
Etiketarik gabe, Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen!
|
| Gaia: | The dispute of meaning generated by the found positions of #Metoo and Une autre parole about harassment and its sanction in the Latin American, European, and American press is analyzed. The competing speeches that legitimized and contaminated the claims of both positions were examined. The methodology proposed by the civil sphere theory was used. It was analyzed how civil and anti-civil motives, relations, and institutions were imputed or attributed to both the #Metoo and the Other word. It was concluded that competing speeches defined the legitimacy of these positions based on class binaries, race, political activism, moral position, aggression, and the centrality of the feminine. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2395-8669 |