Lower Secondary School Mathematics Teachers’ TopicSpecific Content Knowledge in the U.S. and Russia

This interpretive cross-case study examined the U.S. and Russian teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of lower secondary mathematics. In total, N=16 teachers (8 from the U.S., and 8 from Russia) were selected for the study using non-probability purposive sampling technique. Teachers completed the T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tchoshanov, Mourat
Other Authors: Cruz Quinones, Maria, Ibragimova, Elena, Shakirova, Liliana, Шакирова, Кадрия
Format: Artículo
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.26907/esd14.1.05
https://eandsdjournal.org/wp-stuff/uploads/sites/2/2019/04/141-final.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This interpretive cross-case study examined the U.S. and Russian teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of lower secondary mathematics. In total, N=16 teachers (8 from the U.S., and 8 from Russia) were selected for the study using non-probability purposive sampling technique. Teachers completed the Teacher Content Knowledge Survey (TCKS) as part of the purposive selection. The survey consisted of multiple-choice items measuring teachers’ content knowledge at the cognitive levels of knowing, applying, and reasoning. Teachers were also interviewed on the topic of fraction division using questions addressing their content and pedagogical content knowledge. In order to analyze the qualitative data, we conducted meaning coding and linguistic analysis of teacher narratives as primary methods of analysis. The study revealed that there are explicit similarities and differences in teachers’ content knowledge as well as its cognitive types. The results are reflected in meanings expressed and language used by teachers while responding to topic-specific questions on the division of fractions. The results of the study suggest that in the cross-national context teachers’ knowledge could vary depending on curricular as well as socio-cultural priorities placed on teaching and learning of mathematics. The study’s main findings contribute to the body of literature in the field of cross-national research on teacher knowledge with a narrow focus on a topic-specific knowledge. It suggests close comparison and learning about issues related to teacher knowledge in the U.S. and Russia with a potential focus on re-examining practices in teacher preparation and professional development.