TASKS ANALYSIS IN SPECIALIZED CONSTRUCTION WORK IN THE ALTOS NORTE REGION OF JALISCO

Construction workers in Mexico are exposed to ergonomic risks that, in the medium or long term, are associated with musculoskeletal disorders in both upper and lower limbs. Performing manual activities above shoulder level represents one more factor that can be associated with muscle fatigue of the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Villegas Romero, Mario Alberto, Hernandez Arellano, Juan Luis
Format: Capítulo de libro
Language:English
Published: SEMAC 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://semac.org.mx/images/stories/libros/Libro%20SEMAC%202022.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Construction workers in Mexico are exposed to ergonomic risks that, in the medium or long term, are associated with musculoskeletal disorders in both upper and lower limbs. Performing manual activities above shoulder level represents one more factor that can be associated with muscle fatigue of the upper limbs, which leads to a reduction in the physical performance of workers. In the Altos Norte region of Jalisco, traditional roof construction consists of the manual placement of "wedges" to form a vault that is later cleaned to eliminate excess mixture and leave an apparent view. This activity involves a specialized operator whose main activities are performed standing up and with his arms above shoulder level to remove the excess mixture, using a small hand tool. When performing the task analysis, the postures adopted by the worker are classified and prioritized to determine which postures require further analysis, after the classification performed according to the methodology used, 3 activities were detected as relevant, which together accumulate 90% of the images analyzed, in addition, by using the Humantech® Industrial Ergonomics software, the members involved in the operation are evaluated and the level to which they are exposed is determined by means of a risk scale. With this tool, both upper members were identified as having a high risk level, accumulating an overall rating of 33 points, on a scale of 30 to 49 for the high level.